that's what I would have imagiined and i still can't quite wrap my nogin around it, but quoted:
"Shooting uphill or downhill can be a problem because the eye and brain percieve the range to be the longer slant distance to the target while the bullet drop more closely approximates that of the shorter horizontal distance. Whether the angle is uphill or downhill makes no difference. The strike of the bullet will be above point of aim. For shots within 10 degrees of horizontal, the correction is so small that it can be ignored. For example, a hunter using a 7mm 150-gr. bullet at a muzzle velocity of 3110 f.p.s. takes aim on a bighorn sheep on a 35 degree hillside at a slant distance of 400yds. However, if a perpendicular line could be extended downhill from the ram it would intersect the level on which the hunter is standing at a horizontal distance of 328 yds. With his rifle zeroed at 200 yds, the bullet will strike 19.9" below point of aim at 400 yds. on level ground. But in firing at the steep angle, the bullet drop equates to the 328 yds of horizontal distance. At that shorter yardage, the bullet's strike below point of aim is 9.5". If the hunter adjusts his his point of aim to allow for a 400 yd trajectory, the bullet will arrive 10.4 inches above his hold and quite possibly miss his quarry altogether." (NRA Firearms Sourcebook 2006)"
The writer doesn't go into the associated physics of WHY this is though, and it's giving me a headache trying to solve it. Bullet drop is supposed to be a constant acceleration as soon as the bullet leaves the muzzle The distance is longer, therefore the flight time is longer, therefore gravity has more time to act on said bullet, right? (or does the uphill flight have a lower acceleration of gravity till it levels out? - that wouldn't make the "no difference for uphill / downhill" statement work). I'm stumped