Author Topic: crosman destroyers  (Read 3072 times)

Offline 1377x

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
    • http://
crosman destroyers
« on: June 20, 2010, 11:25:55 AM »
what is the difference between the crosman destroyer ex and a regular destroyer?

Offline Bentong

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 837
    • http://
Re: crosman destroyers
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2010, 04:53:26 PM »
Crosman Destroyer EX from walmart $2.00 shoots very well on my modded 1377 and QB79 .177 but no good from my G1, Sierra Pro, Genesis & Rs2.
Try here > http://www.gatewaytoairguns.com/airguns/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=26937&posts=15&start=1

Offline ezman604

  • Owner/Executive Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
RE: crosman destroyers
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2010, 05:32:05 PM »


Ed, comparing the two I found the originals to be a cleaner and better made product. The EX I bought looked like it had either not very clean molds or less quality control. I tried both in my XL1500 and found in a 10 shot chrony string that the EX had a spread of 38.89fps and the originals only 18.58fps. The originals also seemed to fit the breech better.



Oh, and Pyramyd advertises as only having the originals.



Happy Shooting!!!!



Dave



Crosman/Revelation 760 PumpMaster (Vintage 1967)
Powerline 1000S .177 (semi-tuned by me)
Benjamin Super Streak .177/.22 (semi-tuned by me)
Benjamin Trail NP XL1500 (bone stock)
Benjamin Trail NP XL1100 (project gun)
TF89 .22 (tuned by Gene)
Winchester 1000WS .177 (semi-tuned by muwah)
QB57 (l

Offline rocker1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
RE: crosman destroyers
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2010, 10:01:18 PM »
I found the ex to be very loose and would get more than the occasional flier. thanks  david
XL1500177  XL1100 22 CROSSMAN PHANTOM 177 REMINGTON SUMMIT22 CROSSMAN STORM 177 BENJAMINE 392P 22 RWS MODEL 45 177 CROSSMAN 1377 CROSSMAN TITAN 22 AND A B-3 CHING CHANGE

Offline 1377x

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
    • http://
Re: crosman destroyers
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2010, 04:40:48 AM »
thanks for the link
and the help