Author Topic: Tentative accuracy  (Read 1252 times)

Offline cfxlongshot

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
    • http://
Tentative accuracy
« on: November 24, 2008, 09:20:40 AM »
Here are some pics of my targets after a shooting session with the Gamo CFX (TTuned) and the new RWS 350.  These were shot at 10 yards while checking velocity.  I just flared the skirts but didn't weight them.  Using my RWS 350 on the first target group A is with 3 shots of JSB predators and group B is 8 shots with el cheapo Daisy precision max (I use them to break stuff in).  (note: the blue dot in group
A is my aimpoint not a pellet hole, I had 2 pellets go through the same hole.)  The second target is my beloved CFX and 7 shots in the center and I used the little pictures as my aimpoints on the outside shots just to make it harder.
TTuned Gamo CFX.22, Gamo Shadow .177, Marksman 2004. Beeman RS-1, Crossman 1377 w/stock, RWS model 350 .22, RWS 460 Magnum .177,Crosman 357 .177, Career Fire 202s 9mm

Offline shadow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11453
    • http://airguncamo@yahoo.com
RE: Tentative accuracy
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2008, 11:59:37 AM »
Nice holes in the paper Rocky, that would do fine in the hunting field.:) Ed
I airgun hunt therefore I am... };)  {SHADOWS Tunes & Camo}  airguncamo@yahoo.com

Offline mantis

  • GTA Donations
  • ******
  • Posts: 10
RE: Tentative accuracy
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2008, 02:22:35 PM »
Wow, that CFX looks really accurate.  I have been trying to decide between the CFX and the RWS 34.

Offline prdmr

  • GTA Donations
  • ******
  • Posts: 20
RE: Tentative accuracy
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2008, 02:38:22 PM »
Thanks for posting that.
 
I have a CFX with 3-9x50m scope on order, but it is backordered. Seems everyone is out of them right now. Due in the 25th, so maybe I'll get it early next week.