The "Hollow-Earth Theory".....what are your thoughts?

[Evo|ve_S|66]

Alright, so I've been scouring the youtube website quite a bit lately after "accidentally" stumbling upon a video that I thought looked interested.....and boy was it interesting. Now I can't get enough of this "Hollow-Earth Theory". I've listened to interviews, on air broadcasts, read articles and watched numerous documentaries.

I dunno about you guys, but I'm just easily fascinated What do yall think?

-Jarred

[PeakChick]

If the Earth didn't have the combination liquid and solid ferrous core, it wouldn't have the magnetic field that it does, and we'd all be dead from the bombardment of solar radiation that it protects us from.

[North Pack]

Exactly Peak,  ....

[North Pack]

You are kiddin' - right??? ...

[Bogey]

Hollow Earth?   I doubt it.    I am more inclined to believe the 2012 stuff and I don't believe that either.

With the volcanoes we have , the plate shift, lava ,etc.  Hallow Earth is hard to imagine.

Besides, I would not go  anyway....I don't like caves.  You can go in my place.

Right now I'm heading for an Arizona Sweat Lodge for some whatever.

[airiscool]

"..............also, the "data denial act" that was passed in 2006 (don't quote me on the title) has revealed that no satellites are allowed to take photographs of the North and South poles....why??  .............."

Then I guess you've missed all the sateillite pictures of Antartica (including the South Pole regon) in recent years showing changes in the snow and ice fields and large sections of ice shelves breaking off.

Or the multitude of pictures on the web in the last year  showing the artic (including the North Pole regon) and  how much of the ice fields have melted up there.  

There's a lot of satelllites photos of both poles on the web as part of the evidance being used to support the other "conspiracy" - global warming.

"..................Also supposedly leaked pictures of those poles shows that there's always a thick layering of clouds covering those specific areas. Also interesting.  ............"

Rarely, it's too cold and dry in those areas for much cloud cover. In fact, Antiartica is technically classed as a desert because it recieves less than 10 inches of precipatation a year. Can't form clouds without LOTS of  moisture !!!!


I love it when  one wacky conspiracy gets cancelled out by another wacky conspiracy.  

A wise man once told me,  "Always get your info from the horse's mouth .... and be smart enough to know which end of the horse your talking to." .

Paul.

[Evo|ve_S|66]

Yes you are all correct. But we still don't know what's inside the Earth even to this day. It's been speculation and theories. Sure there's been drilling into the Earth's curst, but let's face it. We can't drill that deep.....there are good assumptions that have strong supporting evidence n' whatnot, but there is no strong tangible evidence to logically conclude this endless endeavor. I'm not discounting the fact that there is and isn't a core, and whether the Earth is hollow or not. I'm open to both, but we can't say for sure until we go out and "look".

And also "airiscool", I'm talking about the "certain/specific" latitude/degrees on the North and South poles. You will see that it's nearly impossible to find a dead center image......also regarding your cloud statement, that most certainly does not discount the fact that there might be cloud cover over those areas..

Regards,

-Jarred

[RedFeather]

Well, vulcanologists have a pretty good idea of what lies below the surface.  They have accurately modeled volcanoes and their substructure which does go down through the crust.  No, we can't see beyond that, literally, but you've got good old gravity to contend with.  Scientists can accurately measure the mass of the Earth.  From that point you can then determine the density.  A body as large as a planet will have considerable gravitational force at its core, meaning your hollow Earth would probably collapse upon itself.  And what have the Atlanteans to say about all of this?  I'm waiting for their input before casting my vote.

[daveshoot]

Seismic evidence seems pretty conclusive. You can track an earthquake, or a really big explosion, all the way through the earth, and deduce solidity (or liquidity) from that alone. You can see where a hollow earth would transmit vibration very differently.

[airiscool]

"
"..............also, the "data denial act" that was passed in 2006 (don't quote me on the title) has revealed that no satellites are allowed to take photographs of the North and South poles....why?? .............."

First hit off a search using "Satellite photos"+"North Pole"

http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/Earth.

If it's not already set for 90 degrees North, O degrees West, you can plug in the numbers hit "reset" and it will show you satellite photos from directly above the North Pole.

Then try plugging in 90 South, 0 West.

Paul.

[Evo|ve_S|66]

Koolio

Gotta get used to working that little website you linked me though.....great site!

-Jarred