Author Topic: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles  (Read 4375 times)

Offline jberenyi

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 241
    • http://www.taclatch.com
Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« on: June 10, 2009, 10:05:47 AM »
I'm dying to know how this turns out. How many prefer illuminated or non given the choice?
\"The only tuner I trust is me\"

TX200HC .22 (Tuned by JB)
B26 .22
RWS 350 Feuerkraft Pro Compact .22 (Tuned by JB)
Discovery .22
Walther CP88 Competition .177
Crosman CP11


Offline fsdanlie

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
    • http://
RE: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2009, 12:57:31 PM »
I don't see a( both) button,I like em both ways.
GS1000,177 /Stoeger x-20,177/ RWS-350p,22/ Gamo hunter sport,177/ Winchester1000XS,177/ RWS460Mag,22/ SS1000,22/, Panther34,22/, Diana350 Mag.,177/,Diana34Classic,177WithPG2/,B-3,177/, S1,177/, DianaP5,177

Offline bcshooter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • http://
RE: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2009, 01:08:44 PM »


Hi John,



I agree with Danny, I like both, just like to have a choice when its time to make my shot count.....Bill

AIR ARMS TX200 MkIII .22cal w/Bushnell Banner 6-18x50 AO      
BAM B 26   .177cal w/Centerpoint 4-16x40 AO/IR
BAM B 30-1 .177cal w/Leapers 4-16x50 AO/IR
CROSMAN 1377 .22cal w/UTG BugBuster 6x32 AO/IR
CROSMAN 2240 .177cal 10.1\" LW barrel w/UTG BugBuster 6x32 AO/IR
CROSMAN 2250B .22cal w/UTG Leapers 2-7x32 AO/IR
DIANA/RWS Model 34N .177cal w/Bushnell Sportsman 4-12x40 AO
DIANA/RWS Model 34P .22cal w/Centerpoint 4-16x40 AO/IR
DIANA/RWS Model 350 .22cal Feuerkraft Pro Compact w/Vortek PG-2 and Bushnell Banner 6-18x50 AO
DIANA/RWS Model 48  .177cal w/Centerpoint 4-16x40 AO/IR
DIANA/RWS Model 52   .22cal w/Leapers 4-16x50 AO/IR
DIANA/RWS Model 54  .177cal w/Leapers 4-16x50 AO/IR
DIANA/RWS Model 54   .22cal w/Leapers 4-16x50 AO/IR


Offline tjk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2275
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2009, 01:21:46 PM »
To be totally honest,...I have several Center-Point scopes with illuminated rets,...but I rarely use them at all. I should probably remove the batteries so they don't corrode into the scope rets and/or other internal mechanisms. I will say, I prefer the green 'glow' over the red. It's cool as heck using them,...but at that time of day,...or evenning, it's getting time to sack out for this weary soul!!!! LOL's tjk PS. I'd be happy just to win a cool hundred grand on a power-ball ticket,....pay off the mortgage,...and some debt,...and retire with a part time job being a greeter at Wally-World!!!,...OK, maybe Lowes or Home Depot!!!
397 Benji-98\' model    
Marksman  0035, My Fav!,CDT T\'d
Crosman Sierra-Pro,.177
Benji 392 08\'
CDT TT\'d RWS 34 .22,CP 4-16X40 AO
MM T\'d Marksman 0035
Crosman G1 Extreme
Daisy PowerLine 1000
TF-97 .22
B-28A MM T\'d
B-28 OEM Tuned by me
Beeman .22 RX-2 w/Theoben GR
Beeman .177 R1 Santa Rosa

Offline daveshoot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1593
    • http://
RE: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2009, 01:26:44 PM »
I don't really think there is a down side, because you can just not turn them on when you don't want 'em. I don't care for them much, but I wouldn't pass on a scope just because it had them. I would just leave the light off.
Steroid Sheridan rocker, Daisy 990, SS1000, B26-2, QB-57, Crosman 150 (TW), Crosman 1377 x 2,  RWS5G, MP513, IZH53, RWS9N/Cometa, MP661k Drozd, Walther Falcon Hunter, RWS 34 Panther, XS-B3-1, Cummins B3s, RWS94 Cometa x 2, RWS48, Beeman R7, Daisy Avanti 853, RWS92 Cometa 220, Beeman P3, IZH-46M x 2, Daisy Avanti 747, Diana 24, B5-10, BSA Lightning .22, Crosman Marauder #39 .22, Crosman 1322 Phase 1, Diana Model 20, HW70, Shin Sung Dragon Slayer .50, Haenel Model 26, Slavia 620, HW45/.177

Offline Magnum

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1530
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2009, 01:57:37 PM »
The question is do I prefer illuminated? so I say no... I have plenty of scopes with this feature but use non illuminated reticle 99% of the time..I do like my red dot scope on pistol But not counting that:) if I cannot see target well its not fun to me , i would prefer night vision lol:) when experimenting with the illuminated reticle it seems too bright most of the time!  personally I wish there was a chioce like save $20 bucks on the scope by not having it:)

Offline shadow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11453
    • http://airguncamo@yahoo.com
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2009, 10:41:51 PM »
I use both since I hunt in low light conditions and night hunt. If I don't have a laser mounted then I switch on the illuminated reticles. Ed
I airgun hunt therefore I am... };)  {SHADOWS Tunes & Camo}  airguncamo@yahoo.com

Offline TCups

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3525
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2009, 12:29:37 AM »
All other things being equal, I prefer the option of illuminated reticle scopes.  I rarely use them, but when it is needed, if your rifle doesn't have one . . .  well.  But ask the question another way:  presuming the same scope were available with or without lR, how much extra would you pay for the IR?  In most cases, nothing, since my best shooting PCP already has an IR scope.  Everyone should own at least one.  It probably shouldn't add more than 10% to the price of the scope, max, though.

Offline airgunandy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 819
    • http://
RE: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2009, 01:08:59 AM »
I have one scope that has IR, a Leapers compact 4X (similar to a Bugbuster, but no AO). I use it on my "tactical" Crosman 760 to occasionally plink cans after dark. For those half-dozen times a year I do that, the lighted retical is super cool! I picked the scope up at a gun show for $20 so I don't feel I paid extra for the lighted feature.
I wouldn't go out of my way to buy another lighted scope just to get the light, but I wouldn't pass on a scope that had the features I want plus the light for a good price.

Offline cfxlongshot

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2009, 01:30:44 AM »
Illuminated reticles are great for the times that I hunt.  I usually hunt in the early early morn or at dusk and at that time the shadows are getting real long and its to bright for nightscopes (I don't have one but I can still hope) and the critters really love to sit in the shade so the crosshairs disappear.  I also love the hunt under my security light and rabbits and skunks hang around the edges of it also. Most lluminated reticles are to bright for nighttime shooting but I messed up once and left the reticle turned on for the weekend and when I realized it the battery was real weak, this weak battery lowered the brightness perfectly so now I see great with it.
TTuned Gamo CFX.22, Gamo Shadow .177, Marksman 2004. Beeman RS-1, Crossman 1377 w/stock, RWS model 350 .22, RWS 460 Magnum .177,Crosman 357 .177, Career Fire 202s 9mm

Offline North Pack

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1228
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2009, 01:57:51 AM »
Probably depends on the conditions. I have one on a .22 target rifle (powder), - and have never the illumination option.

Offline spark22

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
    • http://
RE: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2009, 04:54:50 PM »
The only time I ever use the illum on my scope is when I'm looking into dark shadows or heavy woods and when I go night hunting other than that I rearly ever use them,but it's there when I need them and that is nice to know.So I would have to say I would prefer to spen a few more dollars just to have them because there is a time you just might need them.
Marauder .177                               benji discovery .22
fully tuned sub 12ftlbs quest 1000x
fully tuned remington vantage 1200
custom 1322 & 2240

Offline r1derbike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
    • http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v402/r1derbike/
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2009, 05:03:12 PM »
Off daytime, green on in low light.

Charles
Lead Launchers: 30 Year Old Daisy .177 Cal. Model 880 Pumper (BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope), Gamo CFX .22 Cal. Springer with GRT III Trigger (BSA 4X32 Scope), Gamo CFX .177 Cal. Combo Springer (BSA 2-7X32 AO Scope), Gamo R-77 .177 Cal. CO2 Combat Pistol (Laser Sight), Umarex/Beretta .177 Cal. CX4 Storm CO2 Bullpup (Walther PS-22 Red Dot Scope & Dorcy Night Light), Chinese QB-57 .22 Cal. Takedown Springer (BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope & Dorcy Night Light),  Chinese Tech-Force S2-1 .177 Cal. Springer Pistol (Boat Anchor...), Chinese Tech-Force Contender Model 89 .22 Cal. Springer (BSA Laser & Tactical Light, CenterPoint 4-16X40 Illum. Ret. Mil. Dot Scope), Crosman 1377 .177 Cal. Pumper Pistol (1399 stock, BSA 3022SB Red Dot Scope), Daisy Powerline 717 .177 Cal. Single-Pump Pistol (Open Sights).

Offline longislandhunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8204
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2009, 01:27:30 AM »
I don't use the illuminated reticle  feature often but when I need it it's nice to have.  I prefer the green over the red, just makes shooting in low light much easier....

Jeff
\"If it was easy it wouldn\'t be hunting, it would be shopping.\"

Offline xschug3

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
    • http://
Re: Illuminated vs Non-Illuminated Reticles
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2009, 01:44:57 AM »
I rarely use my illumintated reticle on my Centerpoint, but I have had to use it in lower light and it's helped. I like to know that I have it if I need it.
Gamo Big Cat 1200 w/GRTIII and Centerpoint 16x40
Walther Force 1000
B-3
Daisy Powerline 880 from \'95