Chrono Results

[Joe D]

Thought I would post results on some guns now that they are broken in.
Gamo Big Cat -    CPL 938   Hunters 982
Titan -                 CPL 975   Hunters 1008
             
RWS 94  -           CPL 944    Hunters 987
RWS 94 .22 -      CP   762
The 94s are well broken in, but they are the "standard" that I measure others against. My opinion remains unchanged about the RWS 94. One has to spend hundreds of dollars more to get a gun in the same class as the RWS. I am going to sell my Gamo. It is the most difficult of all to shoot accurately. I can't stand the harsh, twangy firing cycle. No, I am not about to throw $150 - $200 into it just to smooth it out. Who would want a $350 Gamo when there are much better guns available like the Titan for a lot less money.
The Titan/TF89 runs a pretty close second to the 94. Trigger is very good - no twang or vibration either. The only thing I don't like is the amount of force required to cock it.

[vinceb]

....the Titan vs. the '94? Do you find one more hold sensitive than the other?

[Joe D]

The 94 is a little easier to shoot off hand. Not much, but a little. Both are light years ahead of a Gamo. Shooting a 3/4" Shoot-N-C at 15-20 yds off hand will tell ypu pretty quickly how easy or difficult a gun is to shoot. It is easy to keep all shoots in the target with both 94s and the Titan. Can't say the same about the Gamo.
I don't find the Titan or the 94 to be hold sensitive at all. The Gamo just "jumps" around too much.