After getting told I couldn't shoot a pellet gun in my yard, and reading the local ordinance (which says: "No person, other than in defense of person or property, shall carry or discharge any species of air gun, air pistol or rifle in the Town of Amherst, Erie County, New York, nor shall any person carry or discharge a shotgun within 750 feet of a building, street, road or public highway in said town." Which seems to suggest air rifles are more dangerous than shotguns...As long as you are not close to a building.). I started to wonder about how that fit with the constitution...
"Searching more comprehensive collections of English language works published before 1820 shows that there are a number of uses that...have nothing to do with military service...[and] The common law was in agreement. Edward Christian’s edition of Blackstone’s Commentaries that appeared in the 1790’s described the rights of Englishmen (which every American colonist had been promised) in these terms 'everyone is at liberty to keep or carry a gun, if he does not use it for the [unlawful] destruction of game.' This right was separate from militia duties."
I wonder if that means local government is in violation of the second amendment. We do have the right to bare arms...Certainly it can't be malicious...but what right does the local government have to say I can't shoot a bb gun?! I think I need to fight this...