Author Topic: B-3 cocking effort  (Read 1929 times)

Offline RedFeather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2308
    • http://
B-3 cocking effort
« on: March 04, 2010, 07:13:33 AM »
I was shooting an old Diana 50 underlever. While not a powerhouse (it's old, original spring and leather seal), the cocking effort is about like my CFX. Not having a chrony, I wondered how it would stack up in penetration against a B3-1? They seem to be about the same power (in .22) but I noticed that the B3 took at least as much effort to cock as the Diana. If my CFX is around 38 lbs, what's a B3 normally run? Maybe it's just an inefficient design? Or did they make some with heavier springs?

Offline longislandhunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8204
    • http://
RE: B-3 cocking effort
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2010, 08:53:12 AM »
I've never measured the cocking force but all 3 of my B-3's require a hefty pull on the cocking arm to fully cock it.  

Jeff
\"If it was easy it wouldn\'t be hunting, it would be shopping.\"

Offline shadow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11453
    • http://airguncamo@yahoo.com
RE: B-3 cocking effort
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2010, 10:22:18 AM »
As do mine but never measured the cocking force . Ed
I airgun hunt therefore I am... };)  {SHADOWS Tunes & Camo}  airguncamo@yahoo.com

Offline RedFeather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2308
    • http://
RE: B-3 cocking effort
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2010, 12:13:29 PM »
Must be the design then. They certainly aren't power houses.

Offline Rontier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
    • http://
RE: B-3 cocking effort
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2010, 04:02:57 PM »
I tried to put the upgrade spring from Summit, & could not get it in so left ti stock.
But it was my first Tune job, and is a smooth cycle, easy cocking accurate AG, just load(as in 22mag!!.