Author Topic: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)  (Read 3071 times)

Offline ribbonstone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • http://
Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« on: July 11, 2007, 12:00:24 PM »
Time on my hands today, so ran some tests with Crosmans and QB's.  

Tried to keep things as even as possible.

1. Put the rifles and co2 cartridges in the out-building workshop and let them "cook" for a short bit.
2. Set the thermostat on the AC to 86 (F) and let it cycle through a few times.  

3. Shot 5 rifles, one shot at a time, in rotation, at a slow pace...with time to jot down notes for each shot...so each had a good long wait between shots.
4. Chronograph was set 5 yards downrange...listed vel, would be corrected MV.

5. ALL rifles had the first two shots "wasted" to be sure the cartridge was well pierced.
6. Target was just a rag stuffed box..no attmept at accuracy testing (have already done that).
7. To help make it an apples-to-apples comparison with the Crosmans, loaded the QB's with one 12gr. cartridges (and a dead one)...can't load the Crosmans with two, so that seemed reasonble.
8. Retest the QB loaded with two cartridges.


Can give a long list of shot-by-shot vel. but that's kind of boring (but I'll do so if someone really wants it).  All .22 pellets are 14.3gr. and all 177's are 7.9gr.
-- -------
QB 78 (.22). Polished, ported, lubed, a slightly heavier hammer spring,reamed out bolt probe, etc.

ONE cartridge:
Vel. drop off started at round #14..and continued gradually until round #22, where it started falling real fast.
For the 14 shots, vel. averaged 645fps / 13.2FPE+

TWO cartridges:
No real surprise here, it worked just about twice as long as one cartridge did...28shots to the drop off, and at 37shots it started falling like a stone.  For the first 28 shots, the average vel was 660fps / 13.8FPE+.(high 672fps - low 639fps)

----------
AR2078 (177). This one has been polished, ported, lubed, but the hammer spring has been reduced a bit for easy cocking and a bit less speed.  Might rethink that after today.

ONE cartridge:
Meaningful vel. drop off started at round #18 and continued at a gradual rate to round #29, where it dropped off fast.  For the first 18shots, the vel. averaged 655fps / 7.5 FPE+.  (High 670fps - low 641fps)

Two Cartridges:
It's on the list of to-dos..ran out of light.
--------------
Crooked Barn Crosman 2260 (26" barrel .22).  Replaced the hammer spring with one slightly stronger, cleaned up any sharp edges, etc. Does NOT have a special valve, is running on a slightly smoothed Crosman valve:

This one got 24 good solid shots before vel. started to drop off, and the vel. drops off much more rapidly than with QB's. Average vel. of 609fps / 11.7FPE+  (High 622fps - low 601fps).
-------------
Crosman 17 / 2250 (26" barrel .177) as issued from the Custom Shop:

This one got 27 good solid shots before starting to drop off...and again, the drop off was quite rapid.  Average vel. of 679fps / 8.1FPE+ (high 707fps  - low 663fps).   that one 707fps shot is way out of line, must be a lite pellet taht escaped inspection...that one shot is 20fps fater than the 2nd highest shot).
------------
Crosman 2240 (14" barrel .22) as issued from the custom shop:

Little fella got an outstanding 28 solid shots before falling off very rapidly. Average vel. only 519fps / 8.6FPE+ (high 534fps - low 511fps). Don't feel sorry for the low speed, it's a bird killing SOB.

------------------
Conslusions:
1. My QB's are eating too much gas. Know it takes more CO2 to go faster, but using almost 80% more gas to toss a pellet a bit less than 10% faster seems like a pretty poor trade.  Going to have to work on balanceing the QB's for the summer heat...any help with ideas here (besides the obvious mucking about with springs) would be appreciated.

2. The large volume of the gas tube seems to be part of the reason QB's vel. drops off much more gradually than the small volume used in Crosmans (basically, the only gas tube on a Crosman is the cartridge itself).

3. There is a vel. gain of about 15fps (on average) for the .22 QB using two live cartridges.
-------

So guys, here is the question.  Lets assume I've done the porting/lubing/etc. right...what i'd want to do would be to knock the QB78 and the AR2078's power DOWN a bit for moe shots per cartridge.  Considering I'll not shoot game past 40yards, if i work backwards, find I'd want 500fps at 40yards....which translates to 625fps at the muzzle (for this .22 pellet).

So I want to lose 35fps to see if I pick up a significant number of shots before drop-off.  Current plan is to decrease the hammer spring of the QB 78 and to increase the VALVE spring on the AR2078 (and here, I'm thnking of a thicker valve washer rahter than changing the spring).

then again, as the shooting has stopped, it all might just be the harp playing in my head.





Robert

  • Guest
RE: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2007, 01:32:18 PM »
Did something of the same this afternoon with my CO2 .22's, fueled by Miller HL's though no Harp on hand.

85F in the shade, Chrony 12 foot out.  Two pellets tried 13.9g Peak dome and boxed CP 14.8g

QB79 Mike Melnik tuned for max power

CP's Avg 718
Peaks Avg 711 (weird in a lighter pellet)

Benjamin AS392 tuned by previous owner

Low power setting

CP's  Avg 545
Peak Avg 578

High Power Setting

CP's Avg 677
Peak Avg 620 (weird again)

AR78

CP's (forgot, must have went for another Miller)
Peak Avg 562

QB78 Carbine

CP's Avg 471
Peak Avg 480

I see about the same gas use as you do with the QB's on 12g cartridges.

Cheers
Mark

Offline ribbonstone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • http://
Got to playing with the numbers...
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2007, 02:14:30 PM »
...was considering the  shots that were never more than 20-30fps less than the max. as the cut off point.  IF I get way-excessive and move that cut off to 80fps, can really see the slower drop off of the QB's (even using one cartridge).

By moving to a large 80fps range, the Crosmans only pick up 2 or 3 shots.  The QB picks up 9 shots.  When the Crosman (and it's small tank volume) gives up, it gives up fast....when the QB starts declining, it's a much more gradual decline.

That's way too much vriation for any kind of longer range shooting or exacting target work...but it does show one differnce in the way the two types hold and use their co2.
Robert

Offline mikeiniowa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1110
    • http://airgunartisans.com/flyingdragon
RE: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2007, 05:29:31 PM »
Try reducing the ID of the transfer port seal, sounds too simple but give it a shot.........

Offline ribbonstone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • http://
RE: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2007, 09:34:11 AM »
Thanks...hadn't thought of that. Going into the rifle now..will look at the transfer port seal as one solution, but considering how much harder the .22 is to cock than the .177, will try reducing the hammer spring a little first.  IF I can get the Qb running the way I want tonight, will look into the AR2078 tomorrow.
Robert

Offline mikeiniowa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1110
    • http://airgunartisans.com/flyingdragon
RE: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2007, 03:17:48 PM »
Some of the srpings installed at the factory are about 1/4 inches longer than normal, usually installed in the T models. I do have a lighter spring I get at the local hardware store that is lighter but a topuch longer, makes a nice easy cocker. Need one let me know......Mike

Offline ribbonstone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 801
    • http://
RE: Shot strings: need to work on the QB's (LONG!)
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2007, 11:11:16 PM »
Thanks again...will have to chronograph a string (dark once  finished), but reducing the spring length by just a fraction might have done it. Took my time, keep the spring body cool, and ground the dead end back 2/3 a turn.   SEEMS to be giving a few more shots before let-off without much vel. loss, but will have to 'graoh it to be sure.
Robert