It's been a long time since I started this thread, and an update is now in order. After the usual knuckle biting wait that seems interminable, the replacement 410 arrived. Naturally, I had run down my tank earlier and not bothered to get it refilled while the 410 was out on warranty, so a little time passed before I was able to refill my tank and then the rifle in order to see how this new shooter performs.
Right away, I will admit to
not checking that all screws were tight. I'm not going to jinx myself here and start out by assuming the worst. I load the AA magazine with JSB Exacts, close the lever and begin shooting. Exactly 10 pellets later, the brand new AA magazine is failing to index. Fortunately, I already have two excellent OEM magazines by RC Machine to use, both of which have indexed perfectly while two factory magazines have failed. But that's another thread I think.
I decided to investigate the power curve issue by shooting strings at various fill pressures to test the theories about spring strength that have been proposed by various folks including kirby and several on the Straightshooters and the AA owners forum. I fired 40 shots, 4 10 shot strings, at fill pressures of 2900, 3000 and 3100 psi over my F-1 chrony. Results are as follows:
 3100 psi
| 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
|
 1 |
 1052 |  1071
| Â 1073
| Â 1061
|
 2 |  1053 |  1063 |  1074 |  1055 |
 3 |  1050 |  1070 |  1066 |  1050 |
 4 |  1057 |  1069 |  1066 |  1051 |
 5 |  1059 |  1068 |  1067 |  1046 |
 6 |  1056 |  1068 |  1063 |  1046 |
 7 |  1061 |  1073 |  1065 |  1041 |
 8 |  1062 |  1068 |  1061 |  1036 |
 9 |  1059 |  1065 |  1055 |  1032 |
 10 |  1065 |  1069 |  1056 |  1030 |
Â
 3000 psi | 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
|
 1
| Â 1075
| Â 1075
| Â 1062
| Â 1035
|
 2 |  1071 |  1071 |  1058 |  1030 |
 3 |  1072 |  1068 |  1053 |  1029 |
 4 |  1072 |  1070 |  1055 |  1025 |
 5 |  1069 |  1067 |  1049 |  1022 |
 6 |  1070 |  1063 |  1045 |  1016 |
 7 |  1077 |  1078 |  1047 |  1014 |
 8 |  1078 |  1068 |  1039 |  1018 |
 9 |  1073 |  1064 |  1041 |  1006 |
 10 |  1075 |  1062 |  1034 |
 1005 |
Â
 2900 psi
| 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
|
 1 |  1074
| Â 1076
| Â 1039
| Â 1015
|
 2 |  1072 |  1058 |  1032 |  1007 |
 3 |  1068 |  1055 |  1028 |  1003 |
 4 |  1067 |  1059 |  1028 |  1005 |
 5 |  1069 |  1053 |  1023 |  999 |
 6 |  1061 |  1053 |  1032 |  994 |
 7 |  1062 |  1046 |  1021 |  990 |
 8 |  1060 |  1047 |  1017 |  993 |
 9 |  1057 |  1042 |  1020 |  993 |
 10 |  1061 |  1044 |  1016 |  985 |
Â
 It appears that the earlier speculation was on target, the power curve appears at the slightly higher fill pressure.Â
This rifle also seems to shoot better than the earlier one. It may be psychological, but the other rifle would have uncalled fliers at very close ranges that didn't make sense. A behavior that the replacement rifle has yet to exhibit. Also, the new rifle seems to shoot within a tighter velocity spread from the begin of a fill to the last shot.
Eric
Â