Author Topic: How definitive is the "tissue test"?  (Read 5068 times)

Offline RedFeather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2308
    • http://
How definitive is the "tissue test"?
« on: April 16, 2010, 01:15:31 AM »
This is the one in which you place a single layer of tissue over the breech and shoot to see if the tissue moves, indicating a leaky seal. I have an old, gnarly circa 1967 Milbro with what must be the original leather breech seal. The seal is flat as a board, yet the gun will shoot with some authority and the tissue is undisturbed. I can't see how the breech can be sealing. Does it have to be a big leak in order for this test to work?

Offline Gene_SC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11378
    • http://www.airguntoys.com
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2010, 03:10:17 AM »
No, not really Red. I use toiliet tissue when I supect a bad breech seal. You can alos use a piece of wax paper by placing it between the breech seal and action. If when shot the hole is round, then that would indicate no leak but if the paper is blown out on one side you probably have a bad breech seal.
THE ONES I SLEEP WITH: BSA Lightning XL, AA TX-200, AA ProSport, BSA Ultra, HW-97K, Crosman NPSS .177, FX Cyclone, HW-30 Nicle Plated, AA-S200, Crosman Marauder, CZ-634, R-9 DG, Webley/Scott UK Tomahawk, Benji Kantana, Benji Marauder, Benji Discovery.....
....

Gene\'s Tunz n Toyz
Springer Tunin

Offline daveshoot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1593
    • http://
RE: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2010, 03:24:13 AM »
Now that's an interesting tip!
Steroid Sheridan rocker, Daisy 990, SS1000, B26-2, QB-57, Crosman 150 (TW), Crosman 1377 x 2,  RWS5G, MP513, IZH53, RWS9N/Cometa, MP661k Drozd, Walther Falcon Hunter, RWS 34 Panther, XS-B3-1, Cummins B3s, RWS94 Cometa x 2, RWS48, Beeman R7, Daisy Avanti 853, RWS92 Cometa 220, Beeman P3, IZH-46M x 2, Daisy Avanti 747, Diana 24, B5-10, BSA Lightning .22, Crosman Marauder #39 .22, Crosman 1322 Phase 1, Diana Model 20, HW70, Shin Sung Dragon Slayer .50, Haenel Model 26, Slavia 620, HW45/.177

Offline RedFeather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2308
    • http://
RE: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2010, 03:27:46 AM »


Well, it sure beats me. I think I've tried tissues on my old Haenel which, surely, has the original 1928 seal. That one shoots pretty slow, though, so it may not be producing a lot of blow by. These seals are the fat, wide style. O rings have gone a long way in improving things. (Plus they are a heck of a lot easier to replace!) Think I will give the wax paper test a try.



You know, thinking about it, I'm wondering if the old leather-sealed guns have as much problems with breech seals as do modern ones?


Offline Gene_SC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11378
    • http://www.airguntoys.com
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2010, 03:38:15 AM »
I have seen flat breech seals that were flat,  nicked and gouged that did not leak on 800 fps guns. The ones I would see the worst was Gamo and Crosman breech seals. But they did not leak. But even if a springer shoots in the 500 fps range it will leak past the breech seal if it is bad enough.
THE ONES I SLEEP WITH: BSA Lightning XL, AA TX-200, AA ProSport, BSA Ultra, HW-97K, Crosman NPSS .177, FX Cyclone, HW-30 Nicle Plated, AA-S200, Crosman Marauder, CZ-634, R-9 DG, Webley/Scott UK Tomahawk, Benji Kantana, Benji Marauder, Benji Discovery.....
....

Gene\'s Tunz n Toyz
Springer Tunin

Offline RedFeather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2308
    • http://
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2010, 03:49:19 AM »
Guess I will leave the seals alone then. On the Milbro, the gun was almost a basket case. Wrong stock screw (missing the other), cracked stock, lots of surface rust/pitting. The piston looks to have black dried grease on it and the spring is bare. However, it shoots with no twang whatsoever. I can't refinish it without pulling it completely apart. You watch. Clean it all up, put it back together and I will bet dollars to doughnuts it will ring like a bell with each shot. BTW, this is sort of an extension of the Diana 27 which Milbro Scotland got to produce following WWII. And it has a decent trigger, too. Came as part of a deal, thrown in for $20.

Offline gmh45345

  • GTA Donations
  • ******
  • Posts: 34
    • http://
Gene is giving tuning
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2010, 03:55:41 AM »
secrets away. Thanks for the tip Gene.
Gary

Offline itsnotom

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
    • http://
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2010, 01:59:54 AM »
if it aint broke, dont fix it

Offline kiwi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
    • http://www.nzairgunners.com
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2010, 10:21:36 AM »
I use soapy water....but that has just changed since
I read Gene's wax paper trick...I now use wax paper..LOL

Pete
Kiwi

Spring guide sets...  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?
http://www.nzairgunners.com

If guns are outlawed ONLY outlaws will have guns

A tin of Gamo pellets is like a box of chocs U never know what yer going to get.....



Offline bigbadwulff

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
    • http://
Re: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2010, 02:33:11 AM »
Isn't wax paper a little rough on your 'breech' :)

Offline davee1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1186
    • http://
RE: Hoe definitive is the "tissue test"?
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2010, 07:32:07 AM »
I've never had any luck with the tissue paper test. Probably because the leaks were slight, or they were leakingair on the bottom half. When I got a chrony, I replaced a bunch of breech seals on my guns which passed the tissue paper test. In most guns, I saw improvement in velocity, consistency, and grouping. It took me hours of patient work. Then when I started shimming the seals I saw more improvement. More hours of patient work. But in the end, I was fairly confident that I had squeezed more performance out of my guns. Thats one of the reasons why a chrony is an excellent tool.
Walther Falcon.25, Shadow.177, Shadow Express.22, Whisper.22, CFX.177/.22, B3AK.22, B3.177(x2), B4.22, B21.22, B26.22, Diana350M.177/.22, Beeman1073.177/.22, Hammerli Storm.22, Hammerli X2.177/.22, BeemanP1.177, P3.177, P17.177(x2), Diana5G(P5).177, Diana LP8, Browning800, BenjiHB22, Crosman1377, Marauder.22