« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2010, 10:45:49 AM »
First, to answer the question, that is a great price on a great rifle (the RWS52 from AoA). A good used RWS48 is sure to please as well. Those guns are a little on the heavy side but the payoff is quality throughout.
A TKO or %%*^(()*)%$*% shroud can alleviate noise concerns.
But, why no break-barrels? That would open a lot of doors within your budget (RWS34, Cometa Fenix, tuned B26)? I think there is still a perception that break barrels are somehow intrinsically less accurate, but I think the market has decided otherwise. Break-barrels do seem to offer convenience, safety, and an economy of parts and motions. I know there are reasons to go other directions, just curious to know what yours are.

Logged
Steroid Sheridan rocker, Daisy 990, SS1000, B26-2, QB-57, Crosman 150 (TW), Crosman 1377 x 2, RWS5G, MP513, IZH53, RWS9N/Cometa, MP661k Drozd, Walther Falcon Hunter, RWS 34 Panther, XS-B3-1, Cummins B3s, RWS94 Cometa x 2, RWS48, Beeman R7, Daisy Avanti 853, RWS92 Cometa 220, Beeman P3, IZH-46M x 2, Daisy Avanti 747, Diana 24, B5-10, BSA Lightning .22, Crosman Marauder #39 .22, Crosman 1322 Phase 1, Diana Model 20, HW70, Shin Sung Dragon Slayer .50, Haenel Model 26, Slavia 620, HW45/.177