Author Topic: CFX  (Read 2793 times)

  • Guest
CFX
« on: August 20, 2007, 11:51:52 PM »
I bought a CFX .177 at a Cabelas store last year and I was able to check the serial number location on the barrel prior to purchase.  I have now ordered a CFX from Pyramid.  Does the .22 also have the serial number in 2 possible locations as well.  I had heard that this S/N location determines which barrel you have and effects pellet fit.
                                                                                          Jeffery

Offline Splash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2123
    • http://www.airgunspa.com
RE: CFX
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2007, 01:32:45 AM »
I'm not sure if the .22 has the #'s in 2 possible places, or not. I do have a .22 CFX and my #'s are on the barrel and the pellets fit fine. Hope that helps alittle.
Mike
Mike
We can\'t control the wind, but we can adjust our sails.
http://www.airgunspa.com
http://www.airgunone.com
http://www.airguntricks.com

Offline Gene_SC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11378
    • http://www.airguntoys.com
Re: CFX
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2007, 02:49:48 PM »
All my CFX's have serial numbers on the top of barrel and pellets fit great as well...:)

Gene
THE ONES I SLEEP WITH: BSA Lightning XL, AA TX-200, AA ProSport, BSA Ultra, HW-97K, Crosman NPSS .177, FX Cyclone, HW-30 Nicle Plated, AA-S200, Crosman Marauder, CZ-634, R-9 DG, Webley/Scott UK Tomahawk, Benji Kantana, Benji Marauder, Benji Discovery.....
....

Gene\'s Tunz n Toyz
Springer Tunin

Offline Gene_SC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11378
    • http://www.airguntoys.com
Re: CFX
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2007, 03:06:08 PM »
Well Paul, a year or so back the big thing was if you had a CFX with serial on side of breech block or barrel.. According to those of higher power..:) The ones with serial number on top of barrel had a tighter bore when loading pellets. the others were supposed to be loose..:)

Thats was just hear say.. I have not read anything of fact to proove it..

Gene
THE ONES I SLEEP WITH: BSA Lightning XL, AA TX-200, AA ProSport, BSA Ultra, HW-97K, Crosman NPSS .177, FX Cyclone, HW-30 Nicle Plated, AA-S200, Crosman Marauder, CZ-634, R-9 DG, Webley/Scott UK Tomahawk, Benji Kantana, Benji Marauder, Benji Discovery.....
....

Gene\'s Tunz n Toyz
Springer Tunin

Offline PeakChick

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2029
    • http://
RE: CFX
« Reply #4 on: August 21, 2007, 03:18:28 PM »
Interesting, I had not heard this before. Both my CFXs .177 and .22 have the serial # on top of the barrel.
The current stable, (arsenal, quiver?): BSA Lightning XL .177, BSA Sportsman HV .22, BSA Ultra .177, CZ634 .177, Daystate Harrier X .177, TAU 200 Senior .177, HW 97 .177, HW 50s .177, HW 30 .177, RWS 92 .177, Gamo 126 MC Super, Gamo Big Cat .177, AR2078A, QB78 .177, Quest 1000 .177, Beeman SS650 .177., Beeman P17 .177.
________________________________________

Those who do not learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it.

  • Guest
Re: CFX
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2007, 03:19:08 PM »
Yea, that's what I was referring to.  Everybody was goin on about how you had to get a CFX with the number on the barrel or it would't shoot well.  That was when I went to Cabelas and bought one so I could examine it rather then order one on the net.  The one I got at Cabelas was a .177 cause that was the only caliber choice you had then.  I have now ordered a .22 CFX from Pyramid and was just wondering if I should be worried.  This is the first time I have heard that it was just a myth.
                                                                                                           Jeffery

Offline longislandhunter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8204
    • http://
Re: CFX
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2007, 03:45:11 PM »
I remember all that "hub bub" about the serial number placement.  Some guys swore it to be true, not really sure myself if it is in fact a fact :)  

My .177 CFX has the serial # on the barrel, and I must say most pellets fit very snugly, but I don't have another gun to compare it to.  

As for the .22 CFX you ordered,, don't give it a second though,,,, it'll shoot great :)

Best of luck with it.

Jeff
\"If it was easy it wouldn\'t be hunting, it would be shopping.\"

Offline daved

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
    • http://
RE: CFX
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2007, 12:47:03 AM »
As I recall, it only applied to the .177 CFX, no other caliber or models had this glitch.  The claim wasn't so much that one shot better than the other, it was more that they shot better with different pellets.  I know my .177 CFX was the "looser" barrel, but it is and was still a tack driver, at least at 20 yards in the right hands.  Supposedly, the "tight" barrel was good with CPL's, while the "loose" one liked JSB Exacts and Superdomes.  I believe this all fell under the category of "much ado about nothing much" ;-)!  Later.

Dave

Offline CharlieDaTuna

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3405
    • http://www.charliedatuna.com
RE: CFX
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2007, 01:42:17 AM »
That was pretty common knowledge a few years ago and quite controversial. Yes, there was supposed to be a very slight difference in some (but not all)  of the earlier CFX barrels and some pellets did fit a bit loose. I've had an early and late setting side by side on the bench and you could feel the difference using the same pellets. Some said that it made a difference in accuracy depending on the pellet used but most skirts would expand enough so the it wasn't much of an issue. Others would state that pellets would just about fall into the chamber but I never had one that bad. Loose fitting maybe but not falling in and it did depend on the pellet and skirt.

Oh... and everybody knew that the number location did define the difference. All late production models have the number on the barrel.

Something that I forgot to mention. I do not think it was a machining or a production  error at all. I think it was macnined that way intentionally for a good reason and to resolve a particular problem..... and it did resolve the problem. Now what do you think the problem might have been????
Bob  aka:  CharlieDaTuna
Co-founder of the GTA


HOME OF THE GRT-III TRIGGER
   Website:  http://charliedatuna.com/

Home of the NPSS-NP Triggers:  
            http://charliedatuna.com/NPSS.htm

E-Mail:  CDT22@Verizon.net

Benji-342 .177 /Brazilian Winchester 800 .22 /Gamo Cadet .177 /Gamo Shadowmatic .177 /Gamo 440 .22 /Gamo Royal .22 /Gamo Whisper .177 /Gamo SK-1 .20 /B-20 .177 /TF-99 .177 /QB-78 .177 /QB-78t .22 /QB-78-(CD) .22 /QB-78-(CJ) .22/QB-78D .22 /Crosman 2240 .22 /Cros 150 .177 /Crosman Back Packer .22 ?Crosman AS 2250 .22 /Daisy Mod 93 .177 /Marksman 2004 .177 /GS 35 .177 /FWB-124 .177 /Custom Marauder .22 /Custom Disco .177


Offline Splash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2123
    • http://www.airgunspa.com
RE: CFX
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2007, 03:17:33 AM »
Bob, my guess would be that the o-rings around the loading were not lasting very long and the looser barrel helped, until they found better seals. How'd I do,hehe.?
Mike
Mike
We can\'t control the wind, but we can adjust our sails.
http://www.airgunspa.com
http://www.airgunone.com
http://www.airguntricks.com

Offline Avox

  • GTA Donations
  • ******
  • Posts: 27
    • http://
RE: CFX
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2007, 06:28:09 AM »


"Now what do you think the problem might have been????"



Only having the newer CFX in .22 along with some of the complaints I've read about loading. Have to say the looser breach would ease LOADING.