I had a wood-stocked '34 a little over a year ago, a refurbished 94 that I got late last summer, and a refurbished '34 Panther that I got recently.
The first '34 was hard to shoot well, had low velocity for the cocking effort, was large and heavy with a mediocre trigger and a buzzy firing cycle.
The '94 was a little easier to shoot well, had significantly more power, and was easier to handle with a nicer trigger. Firing cycle was smoother.
The '34 Panther also has same low velocity as the first one, but it is VERY easy to shoot well and is nicer to handle than the wood-stock version. Shoots smoother, too - and the trigger on this one is very nice.
I like virtually everything better about the '94 except its hold sensitivity, and certainly prefer it over my older '34. Do I like it better than the Panther? In most respects yes, but the Panther is so easy to be accurate with that I cannot pick a favorite, at least at the moment.
BTW - my '94 is a refurb from Umarex ($120 shipped), as was my Panther ($117 shipped).